On Thursday June 12, 2014, I was asked by Mike Kenealy (FCPA Integrity
COO) & Craig Chadwick (Global Secure Summit)
to address a group of Compliance Professionals from the financial sector in
NYC. In my presentation, I shared my experiences from the field of
international sales, including encountering foreign bribery, cooperation, and
finally, my perspective on current compliance challenges. A group of the
attendees remained after the presentation, where we discussed the
challenges of aligning strategy, compensation & compliance, so that
they all speak to the same message of anti-bribery compliance.
That discussion was in the context of how and why compliance efforts
fail at the field, especially in the environment of a public company,
where profit and sales growth over the short and long term are critical for
return on investment and shareholder value.
I was very much impressed as to the questions asked by the
attendees who remained. Clearly, they understood the challenges that their
international front line business groups face, and they were very much
focused on "what can we do to help." Furthermore, as the
conversation progressed, they acknowledged how incentives and sales
forecasts could actually contradict or distort the messages of compliance
and ethics, especially from the perspective of those operating in
high risk international environments. We talked
about the importance of listening to those in the field and how, as I shared,
"the more disturbing those conversations might be, the better they
are progressing." They clearly grasped how front line international
business people are the most important element in executing an
anti-bribery and corruption program, and how it is the responsibility of
compliance professionals to give them the tools of success.
Rationalization is not justification
I could see from the feedback that I have received since the
presentation, that there was indeed value to the practitioners in
hearing a voice from the field of international sales, as I spent a great
deal of time explaining my own perfect storm of "rationalizing
bribery." There was more than one question asked, as to "what were
you thinking," and I believe that the components of my
"rationalization" model helped to break that down in a way which was
understandable, relevant and engaging. There was also a great deal of discourse
on my discussion of corrupt third parties and how it is often difficult to
detect their "circle of lies" when it comes to investigations and
vetting.
But, as I shared at the start of my presentation, almost as a
preamble, rationalization is not justification. I knew what I was doing was
wrong, and accepted responsibility for my conduct, including the
loss of liberty. Now, the question remains, does that
experience bring value to other individuals and organizations in
their own compliance challenges? Based on the dialog after the presentation,
it certainly did on June 12th, and if it continues to helps others, I
remain open to future opportunities.
Thank you again to FCPA Integrity and GSS for the invitation.
No comments:
Post a Comment